Where is use repeatable?
Maintenance fixes and regression tests carry AI week after week; feature changes barely do. Separate durable maintenance, testing, upgrade and feature workflows before extending the rollout.
Attribute coding-tool use to reviewed changes, then assess delivery, correction and cost in comparable work.
Start with a defined work category and the records available for its review.
Extend the work that earns it, improve the process that needs it.
Maintenance fixes and regression tests carry AI week after week; feature changes barely do. Separate durable maintenance, testing, upgrade and feature workflows before extending the rollout.
Comments and requested updates move a little on like-for-like changes; failed checks move a lot. Keep comments, correction, checks, reverts and incidents visible instead of folding them into one quality score.
Each tool's charge lands on the changes it actually helped merge, so four coding tools rank against comparable work. Compare tool cost against similar merged work, not against seats or tokens.
Every workflow leaves the review with one action and the record it rests on. Scale, improve, consolidate or open another evidence window: here, improve the CI handoff before dependency upgrades expand.