200 engineers got Claude Code six weeks ago. Half the company still defaults to ChatGPT for everything. The investment is real — the adoption signal is not.
INSIGHT
Engineering AI adoption at 89%. Marketing at 34%, up from 12%.
Cursor and Claude Code driving engineering. Claude driving marketing growth.
Does anyone still use Midjourney? Trying to figure out if we should renew
Marketing still uses it for social posts I think
I thought we switched to Firefly last quarter?
Wait, Design has their own subscription? We’re paying for both?
Can someone check the spreadsheet?
Which spreadsheet?
INSIGHT
Org-wide AI adoption at 67%, up from 54% last quarter
Adoption trending upward across all departments with engineering leading
INSIGHT
Finance adoption at 8%. Data handling concerns identified as primary blocker
Team has expressed interest but needs policy clarity first
RECOMMENDATION
Cursor power users identified. 12 engineers averaging 6+ hours daily
High-engagement users who could champion adoption in adjacent teams
REPORT
Q1 AI Program Report ready
Comprehensive quarterly report covering all AI program metrics
You rolled out Claude Code to 200 engineers. Six weeks in. Oximy shows daily users, occasional users, and shelfware. Which teams are driving adoption and which are stalling.
Target the Data team with a hands-on Claude Code session. Include 3 workflow-specific examples from Platform team power users.
INSIGHT
Claude Code: 156 of 200 engineers active. 89 daily, 67 weekly, 44 inactive.
Adoption varies significantly by team, with Platform leading and Data lagging
RECOMMENDATION
Data team may benefit from onboarding session. Low adoption correlated with no hands-on training.
Teams that received structured onboarding adopted significantly faster
34 people use ChatGPT for code review. Cursor does this better and is already approved. 8 people use ChatGPT for legal questions when Harvey is available and purpose-built. The right tool exists. People just don't know about it.
Which teams are using generic tools for tasks where we have purpose-built alternatives?
Engineering: 34 people use ChatGPT for code review (Cursor is better). Legal: 8 people use ChatGPT for contract analysis (Harvey is purpose-built). Marketing: 6 people use ChatGPT for image generation (Adobe Firefly is approved and more capable for brand work).
RECOMMENDATION
34 engineers using ChatGPT for code review. Cursor handles this natively.
Coaching nudge can redirect users to the purpose-built tool
RECOMMENDATION
8 Legal team members using ChatGPT for contract questions. Harvey is approved and purpose-built.
Legal team may not be aware Harvey is available for their workflows
The board asks 'is our AI investment working?' You need data, not anecdotes. Oximy correlates adoption with productivity signals. Cursor users ship PRs 35% faster. Claude Code users in Engineering have higher code review throughput.
Generate a board report on our AI program
Here's your Q1 AI Program Report: 67% org-wide adoption (up from 54%). $28K/mo AI spend with $4,200 savings identified. Engineering leading with 89% adoption and measurable productivity gains. Finance and Legal lagging. 3 policy compliance events, all resolved automatically.
INSIGHT
Cursor users ship PRs 23% faster than non-users (90-day GitHub data)
Productivity correlation based on active usage data and GitHub metrics
REPORT
Board-ready AI Program Report generated
Comprehensive report covering adoption, effectiveness, spend, and risk
Connect your identity provider for instant visibility. Plug in your security tools for usage depth. Deploy the Sidekick for proactive governance.
Install via Kandji, Intune, or JAMF. The Sidekick works with each employee to drive the right AI adoption. Coaching, not blocking.
Inline redaction and DLP:
Redact sensitive data before it reaches AI tools.
Personal adoption coaching:
Suggests the right tools and workflows per employee.
Policy and playbook suggestions:
Recommends governance based on observed usage patterns.
Book a demo and see real adoption metrics. We'll show you which teams are thriving with AI and which need help.